The death of Dr. Abdulrahman bafdl because of a traffic accident       Mahmoud Abbas Gives Up on Peace       A)Putin: Claims Russian jets killed civilians in Syria emerged before airstrikes started       A)A Chinese aircraft carrier docks at Tartus to support Russian-Iranian military buildup       A) TALIBAN CAPTURES 2 DISTRICTS IN NORTH AFGHANISTAN       Defeating the extremists       ISIS LEADER ADMITS TO BEING FUNDED BY THE US       ALL REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES STAND FOR WAR       HALF OF AMERICANS BELIEVE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO BE “AN IMMEDIATE THREAT” TO FREEDOM       BREAKING: RUSSIAN MARINES BATTLE ISIS IN SYRIA    

 Home » News »
Poll finds U.S. split over eavesdropping
Cat : Democracy & H-Rights
Date : 2006-01-11 18:30:27                      Reader : 241

Such a game played by new cons as well as infuencial leaders in Republican party, is stressed upon to gain next elections. But it has nothing to do with the reality. It is expected that FBI would manipulate some terrorist operations in US itself near elections date to give the Americans an impression that without Bush and Republicans, no safely for US!!

That is why spying on citizins is accepted by some, as they feel, more security will be achieved with such acts.

In fact it is flagrant violation of US human rights. If US administration knows suspects they must be caught for investigation,then to court for trial.New  cons went very for in abusing American standards for human rights as ex-president  Mr. Carter said.


CNN.Com Wed- 11/1/2006
 
Poll finds U.S. split over eavesdropping
 
Half say warrants unnecessary; most want changes to Patriot Act
 
 
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Though Americans are growing more skeptical of the White House record on civil liberties, the nation is divided over whether the Bush administration should use wiretaps without first obtaining a warrant, a recent poll shows.
 
A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll of 1,003 adults found that 50 percent of those polled believe it's OK to forgo warrants when ordering electronic surveillance of people suspected of having ties to terrorists abroad.
 
Another 46 percent said the policy is wrong, and 4 percent said they had no opinion. (View some of the poll results)
 
The poll, conducted Friday through Sunday, has a sampling error of 3 percentage points.
 
President Bush has defended signing secret orders allowing the National Security Agency to intercept international communications by people in the United States who are suspected of having links to terrorist organizations.
 
Bush acknowledged signing the orders after the program was first reported in The New York Times, sparking criticism across the political gamut. The president has said the wiretaps are legal and necessary to fight terrorism. (Read about Vice President Dick Cheney's stance)
 
The Bush administration contends that the congressional resolution authorizing military action after September 11, 2001, gave the president wide-ranging power to defend the country, including the power to authorize wiretaps without the approval of a special panel of judges established to approve surveillance.
 
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 states that the special court must approve any eavesdropping on U.S. citizens on American soil.
 
A memo from the Congressional Research Service released last week called Bush's claim that he had a congressional blessing for the wiretaps "unlikely," and Democrats have repeatedly said that the White House broke the law by bypassing the special court.
 
Of the adults polled, 75 percent said they have been following the issue very closely or somewhat closely, but only 29 percent said the issue will be "extremely important" to them in the 2006 elections.
 
Fifty-five percent of those polled ranked terrorism as an "extremely important" issue.
 
On the topic of civil liberties, 38 percent of those polled said the Bush administration has gone too far in restricting civil liberties, while 40 percent said the government's approach has been "about right," and 19 percent said the government had not gone far enough.
 
The numbers show a shift in opinion from 2002, when 11 percent of those polled said the White House had gone too far and 60 percent said the measures used to fight terrorism were "about right."
 
Surveys conducted between the 2002 poll and Tuesday's poll show the percentage of people who think the administration has gone too far has gradually increased.
 
For instance, in 2003, 28 percent said Bush administration officials had overreached in cutting back on civil liberties, and 48 percent said they had struck a proper balance.
 
Tuesday's poll also found that 13 percent of the public believes there should be no changes to the USA Patriot Act, the antiterrorism legislation passed after the 9/11 attacks.
 
The most controversial portions of the law allow the FBI -- with a court order -- to obtain secret warrants for business, library, medical and other records, and to get a wiretap on every phone a suspect uses. It also authorizes the use of "sneak-and-peek" searches, in which authorities don't have to notify the subject of the warrant until later.
 
Portions of the bill were temporarily renewed before Congress adjourned in December, but they will expire in early February unless extended again. (Full story)
 
In the poll released Tuesday, 50 percent of the public said they support minor changes to the law, and 24 percent said they want to see major changes. Seven percent called for it to be scrapped.

 
 
Home  |  News  |  Books  |  Files  |  Album  |  About Us  |  Contact Us
Copy Right Dialogue Yemen